Fact

On 4 November the Supreme Court shelved VOX’s complaint and three complaints over the mass entry

Permanent link https://ceutafacts.org/en/fichas/supremo-archivo-20261104/

On 4 November the Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court shelved a complaint by VOX and three complaints, from Manos Limpias and two private individuals, against Pedro Sánchez and the Council of Ministers over the mass entry. The CGPJ note records that the order does not have “elementos suficientes” to direct a proceeding now against the persons complained against and denounced. It does not declare definitive atypicality. If Judge Tardón later individualises indications, she may send a reasoned exposition. This is distinct from the ultra-urgent measures that the Supreme Court rejected on 27 October.

• On 4 November the Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court shelved a complaint by VOX and three complaints — Manos Limpias and two private individuals — against Pedro Sánchez and the Council of Ministers over the mass entry. The primary source is the CGPJ press note. It is not the shelving of the ultra-urgent measures of 27 October.
• The CGPJ note quotes the order: “as it does not have sufficient elements to justify directing a proceeding now against the persons complained against and denounced.” According to that note, there are not sufficient elements to open that proceeding now against the office-holders with a privileged forum.
• The shelving does not declare definitive atypicality. If Judge Tardón later individualises indications, she may send a reasoned exposition. That is what the note says. It is not a judgment on the merits of the mass entry.